Bot-er Beware: New York City Regulates the Use of Bots in Hiring and Promoting, Effective July 5, 2023

Follow us on LinkedIn to see future News.

Michael J. Fortunato Patricia Tsipras

June 29, 2023

On April 6, 2023, New York City adopted Local Law 144 of 2021 (“NYC 144”), the first law in the nation to regulate the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven tools in hiring and promotion decisions.  It becomes effective on July 5, 2023.

NYC 144 will apply to all employers and employment agencies (referred to herein solely as “employers”), no matter where they are headquartered, if they hire or promote employees who reside in New York City.

NYC 144 requires all New York City employers – by July 5, 2023 – to determine whether they use Automated Employment Decision Tools (AEDTs) to make employment decisions.

Automated Employment Decision Tools (AEDTs) are defined as “any computational process, derived from machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics, or artificial intelligence, that issues simplified output, including a score, classification, or recommendation” that is used to “substantially assist or replace discretionary decision making for making employment decisions that impact natural persons.”  Employers use AEDTs for a variety of tasks in the hiring and promoting process, including selecting candidates for interview and scoring candidates for hiring or promotion.  AEDTs covered under NYC 144 are limited to tools that pertain only to candidates who have applied for a specific job; the law does not apply to AEDTs that are used to identify potential candidates who have not yet applied for a specific position.

If employers use AEDTs, they must:

  • commission an independent bias audit now and annually thereafter
  • publish a summary of the results
  • provide notice to applicants and employees of the tool’s use and functioning no less than 10 business days before using the AEDT
  • provide notice that affected individuals may request an accommodation or alternative selection process

An independent bias audit consists of an evaluation by an independent auditor to assess the tool’s potential disparate impact on sex, race, and ethnicity.

Penalties for violating the new law are significant and include a civil penalty of $375 for the first violation and a civil penalty of at least $500, up to $1,500, for each subsequent violation or uncorrected prior violation.  Each failure to meet the requirement of applicant notices constitutes a separate violation.  Failure to meet the bias audit requirement also results in separate, daily penalties.

This article merely provides a summary of the new law.  The law is as complex and detailed as the AI technology that it seeks to regulate.  If you are using AEDTs, seek legal counsel.  We can help.

 

*Special thanks to Ava Petrellese, our Paralegal, and to Brooke Palma, our Office Administrator, for their contributions to this article.

 

This article is designed to provide one perspective regarding recent legal developments, and is not intended to serve as legal advice.  Always consult an attorney with specific legal issues.

 
© 2026 Rubin Fortunato. All rights reserved. Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Lisi
Rubin Fortunato
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.